Thursday, July 21, 2005
Dahlia Lithwick says: "By deciding not to choose someone blatantly and unapologetically ideological, and by refusing to name someone who has made a judicial career of what I've previously dubbed aggressive "re-activism"—ignoring existing law under the pretense that it's wrongly decided—Bush has revealed that he's in fact more pragmatist than ideologue. He's not, in short, quite the single-minded moral zealot he's been selling."
Of course that assumes that Roberts is not ideological, which, in turn, implies a degree of trust in Bush that I can't seem to bring myself to muster. Bush hates my America-- why wouldn't he do everything in his power to destroy it?
Of course that assumes that Roberts is not ideological, which, in turn, implies a degree of trust in Bush that I can't seem to bring myself to muster. Bush hates my America-- why wouldn't he do everything in his power to destroy it?
Post a Comment